Regular readers of this column know several things about me. 1) I love fashion, and blame it on a genetic predisposition due to my descent from tailors, dress makers and owners of clothing stores. 2) I read the style page in the Miami Herald despite the fact that style is so loosely defined by their editors as being any old rag on any old hag. 3) I am not shy about sharing my (superior) taste and opinions with you, my readers, or the editors of the aforementioned Herald style page.
Yesterday's featured... featured what? I am at a loss for words beyond skank-ho, appalling, mutton-dressed-as-lamb and a few others that even I won't use here. Be warned, the photo is not work or retina safe.

Yeah. Where do I begin? At the top, with the obvious and ratty weave? With her age (43) which means she's old enough to know better (something both RJ and a few others mentioned to me)? With the fact that she's wearing and admitting to wearing (which may even be worse) a perfume that smells like cotton candy?
How about at the bottom, with her boots, which look, even allowing for bad newsprint, filthy and in need of a good cleaning/polishing?
In fact, I would go so far as to say that Ms. Auerbach herself looks in need of a good scrubbing. The RLA, upon seeing this on the dining room table and watching me spew coffee, said merely: Hmm, plastic surgery is THAT girl's friend.
In the interest of full disclosure, I have to say that Auerbach was my maiden name, and I was ready to put my head in the oven in shame over her. But this morning I did my Google homework and found that she married into the name, and so is of no concern to the integrity of my family line. I also found out that she claims not to drink, that she's a body builder, and the divorced mother of two teenagers. They must be very proud of her today.
But wait, there is more to this than meets the scarred retina. I actually read her "hot Valentine's Day tips." I quote, and then I opine:
"Wear sexy red lingerie under your outfit just in case someone special wins your heart; put on a pair of sizzling red stilettos with pencil-leg jeans; carry a designer red tote bag big enough to fill with devilishly delicious chocolate truffles, scented candles and massage oil."
Another thing that readers of this blog know about me is that I am passionate about AIDS education, research and social assistance, and that I served for almost ten years on the board of directors of a local AIDS service organization. So when I say that I almost popped a vein after reading her tips, you know where I'm going next.
Who, in 2007 -- twenty-odd years after the start of the AIDS crisis, can offer the suggestion of being ready for spontaneous sex with some random person who floats your boat on Valentine's day without loading that designer red whore's bag of tricks with condoms? Who would even think of preparing in the morning for a chance encounter that night? And this woman has two teenagers. What is she teaching them?
And where is the journalistic responsibility of the Miami Herald? Oh, yeah. Oxymoron. Herald and journalism or Herald and integrity... The whole enterprise appalled me, and I fired off one of my more scathing letters to the editor. I'm certain it went straight to the digital circular file. Still, would it have killed an editor to rewrite her tip so that it at least pretended to be suggesting you do all this for someone you are already in a relationship with? Or to include condoms in the "be prepared" list? Or even to have chosen someone who looked a little less likely to be found on the side of the road up around 79th Street?
Again, in the interest of full disclosure, I also found that Ms. Auerbach claims to be a writer, one who specializes in writing for the Neighbors section of... The Miami Herald. Can you say circle jerk?
Once again, I find myself shaking my head and asking why I even bother.
Posted by Miz Shoes at February 15, 2007 12:29 PM
I thought of something else she should toss in that "bag of tricks": Valtrex.
Posted by: RJ at February 15, 2007 01:44 PM
what's with the lace? the hair? the grimace? and will someone please separate Hope from her bedazzler
Posted by: nurse myra at February 16, 2007 06:03 AM
1. That looks more like a Drag Queen than a 43 year old woman.
2. She must be in a time warp. That's the only way I can explain her Tiffany throwback sans acid wash denim jacket. And the fact that she's 43 but her scarf is "100 million" years old.
3. I'm not crazy about Valentine's Day, but I do know that it's not about having random sex, it's about being with someone you love.
4. Nope, still a drag queen. Is she smiling?!
Posted by: Brette at February 16, 2007 10:55 AM
Oh, look how proud she is. That's just...sad.
See, this is what happens to women who do not drink. They lose any recognizable sense of humor about themselves, only to wind up deluded and thinking they are indeed Forever 21 and dressing like Pamela Anderson c.1986.
Then they wander all over town in desperate red undies and Jessica Simpson perfume hoping that some busboy will whistle at them and make their lives worth living. For the love of god, she's trotting around with scented massage oil and candles in her bag just in case someone 'steals her heart'?! Someone has clearly stolen her judgement. I suspect Guess would pay her not to wear their jeans.
Posted by: gigi at February 16, 2007 07:13 PM
Great site, but I believe you may have a problem..
YOU ARE VERY JUDGMENTAL..WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO JUDGE PEOPLE ...SO WHAT IF THEY WANT TO HANG THEIR BACKPACKS ON THEIR CHEST...ECT ECT.
I do admit though your site is interesting just leave out bagging people and get a life..no one is perfect...I am sure you have made fashion mistakes too..
cheers
Alexias...p.s..I own more shoes then you have had fucks
Posted by: Alexias at February 22, 2007 11:12 PM
This is just bad magumba all around.
Posted by: lattégirl at February 24, 2007 12:51 PM
There is no computer dating come-on too insipid for this woman.
Posted by: Paul at February 26, 2007 05:47 PM
But this *is* the "before" picture, right? There was an "after" picture below the fold or inside the newspaper. Please tell me this was the "before" picture.
Posted by: Liz at February 28, 2007 08:25 AM